I did check your source code and there is no "FOUND_ROWS()" string as far as I see.
All together should speed things up (bringing total number of rows at data tab in HSQL) as said at MYSQL documentation. Did not look for, how you do it now.
I did try to use it myself, here is what problems I came up with.
http://www.codingforums.com/showthread.php?t=229346
Regards.
Mybe, suggestion
What should exactly get more speed? What's slow?
I had a SELECT FOUND_ROWS() in Heidi in very old times where we did a
I have the feeling I don't understand what you are exactly trying to ask or tell.
I had a SELECT FOUND_ROWS() in Heidi in very old times where we did a
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS * FROM table LIMIT 0,1000
to get the number of rows in a limited result. But that SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS took to long as it works in a way similar to selecting rows with just no limit.I have the feeling I don't understand what you are exactly trying to ask or tell.
Quote:
If you are using SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS, MySQL must calculate how many rows are in the full result set. However, this is faster than running the query again without LIMIT, because the result set need not be sent to the client
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/information-functions.html
If you are using SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS, MySQL must calculate how many rows are in the full result set. However, this is faster than running the query again without LIMIT, because the result set need not be sent to the client
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/information-functions.html
Please login to leave a reply, or register at first.